As I have stated numerous times in the past. In the end Muslims will put aside their differences and stick together when it comes to their goal of world conquest. Now Malaysia whose official religion is Islam, is calling for Muslims to live under Sharia Law, in the U.K.! Are we in the West supposed to believe that Malaysia is an ally of ours? No way!! That is why we non-Muslims must do the same, to fight back. We need countries like the U.S., Canada, U.K., France, Italy, Australia, Germany and others to stand together to defeat the Islamic takeover of the world.
Malaysian president Abdullah Badawi calls for British Muslims to live under sharia law
By Jonathan Wynne-Jones, Religious Affairs Correspondent, In Kuala Lumpur
Last Updated: 5:58PM BST 09/06/2008
Muslim extremism in Britain will grow unless the Government and society learn to understand Islam, Malaysia's prime minister has warned.
Abdullah Badawi claimed that the legacy of Britain's imperial past has hampered its ability to appreciate its Islamic population.
In an interview with the Daily Telegraph, the prime minister urged Gordon Brown to allow the country's Muslims to live under sharia law, but also said that they must prove their worth to society.
His comments are set to fuel the debate over the role of Islam in Britain following the Church of England's attack on the Government for already giving more attention to Muslims than Christians.
A report, commissioned by the Church and published today, accuses ministers of paying only "lip service" to Christianity and marginalising the Anglican and Roman Catholic churches, while focusing "intently" on Islam.
However, Mr Abdullah argues that the Government must do more to ensure Muslims don't feel discriminated against if it is to tackle the rise of radicalism.
"The failure to understand Muslims is driving a divide between the communities," he said.
"Gordon Brown must encourage a better understanding because Britain must appreciate its Muslims."
Mr Abdullah argued that Britain needs to come to terms with being home to immigrants from countries that it used to rule over.
"The British Empire expanded in Asia, everywhere, throughout the Muslim land, through the land of Hindus and the land of Buddhists.
"When they were ruling it was different because they wanted it to be peaceful and to keep it peaceful they had to use diplomacy.
"Now maybe the Government thinks they can forget it. It doesn't matter."
He said that Muslims in Britain were more likely to be radicalised because they feel ignored rather than due to religious reasons.
"Is it because of poverty, social unrest, deprivation, feeling discriminated against, thinking people don't care much because of the
colour of their skin. The could make them to decide to be extremist, not necessarily because of his religion."
Mr Abdullah, who was talking on the eve of a landmark summit of world leaders, echoed the calls of the Archbishop of Canterbury earlier this year for Muslims to be able to live under sharia law.
"They should abide by the law of the land, but they should also be able to follow their religious observances and beliefs, to express their duty to God.."
The conference on the Muslim world and the West, "Bridging the Gap",
begins today with political and religious leaders encouraging a greater
commitment to solving the roots of the divisions.
The Malaysian Prime Minister acknowledged that Muslims must also play their part in proving their value as immigrants.
"If they want to be respected then they must do something for the community," he said.
"They must not be a liability. They have to be an asset."
Link to Article
Thursday, June 12, 2008
Tuesday, June 10, 2008
Muslims are Attacking the Minds of our Children
As I stated in a previous column, Muslims are attacking the minds of our children. They are doing this to brainwash them, by putting a false positive spin on the religion of hate. This is an attempt to get our kids to accept Islam. Then unfortunately, one day in the future they will see they harsh reality of Islam. By then it just might be too late. This is also a violation of separation of church and state, that is happening more and more. There cannot continue to be special rules for Muslims, or we will eventually lose. I urge all parents to ask their kids if they have had Islam preached to them in school. Ask them to immediately notify you if they have been told a class on Islam is upcoming. It is then time to take a stand for the future of our children. Please contact the school and any media outlets possible and voice your displeasure. Also threaten the school with a lawsuit on violating the separation of church and state. This is all part of the war with Islam.
Islam in America's public schools: Education or indoctrination?
Cinnamon Stillwell
Wednesday, June 11, 2008
With fatal terrorist attacks on the decline worldwide and al Qaeda apparently in disarray, it would seem a time for optimism in the global war on terrorism. But the war has simply shifted to a different arena. Islamists, or those who believe that Islam is a political and religious system that must dominate all others, are focusing less on the military and more on the ideological. It turns out that Western liberal democracies can be subverted without firing a shot.
Nowhere is this more evident than in the educational realm. Islamists have taken what's come to be known as the "soft jihad" into America's classrooms and children in K-12 are the first casualties. Whether it is textbooks, curriculum, classroom exercises, film screenings, speakers or teacher training, public education in America is under assault.
Capitalizing on the post-9/11 demand for Arabic instruction, some public, charter and voucher-funded private schools are inappropriately using taxpayer dollars to implement a religious curriculum. They are also bringing in outside speakers with Islamist ties or sympathies. As a result, not only are children receiving a biased education, but possible violations of the First Amendment's Establishment Clause abound. Consider the following cases:
Last month, students at Friendswood Junior High in Houston were required to attend an "Islamic Awareness" presentation during class time allotted for physical education. The presentation involved two representatives from the Council on American-Islamic Relations, an organization with a record of Islamist statements and terrorism convictions. According to students, they were taught that "there is one God, his name is Allah" and that "Adam, Noah and Jesus are prophets." Students were also taught about the Five Pillars of Islam and how to pray five times a day and wear Islamic religious garb. Parents were not notified about the presentation and it wasn't until a number of complaints arose that school officials responded with an apologetic e-mail.
Earlier this year at Lake Brantley High School in Seminole County, Fla., speakers from the Academy for Learning Islam gave a presentation to students about "cultural diversity" that extended to a detailed discussion of the Quran and Islam. The school neither screened the ALI speakers nor notified parents. After a number of complaints, local media coverage and a subsequent investigation, the school district apologized for the inappropriate presentation, admitting that it violated the law. Subsequently, ALI was removed from the Seminole County school system's Dividends and Speaker's Bureau.
As reported by the Cabinet Press, a school project last year at Amherst Middle School transformed "the quaint colonial town of Amherst, N.H., into a Saudi Arabian Bedouin tent community." Male and female students were segregated, with the girls hosting "hijab and veil stations" and handing out the oppressive head-to-toe black garment known as the abaya to female guests. Meanwhile, the boys hosted food and Arabic dancing stations because, as explained in the article, "the traditions of Saudi Arabia at this time prevent women from participating in these public roles." An "Islamic religion station" offered up a prayer rug, verses from the Quran, prayer items and a compass pointed towards Mecca. The fact that female subjugation was presented as a benign cultural practice and Islamic religious rituals were promoted with public funds is cause for concern.
Tarek ibn Ziyad Academy, a charter school in Inver Grove Heights, Minn., came under recent scrutiny after Minneapolis Star-Tribune columnist Katherine Kersten brought to light concerns about public funding for its overtly religious curriculum. The school is housed in the Muslim American Society's (the American branch of the Egyptian Islamist group the Muslim Brotherhood) Minnesota building, alongside a mosque, and the daily routine includes prayer, ritual washing, halal food preparation and an after-school "Islamic studies" program. Kersten's columns prompted the Minnesota chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union to issue a press release expressing its own reservations about potential First Amendment violations. An investigation initiated by the Minnesota Department of Education verified several of Kersten's allegations and the school has since promised to make the appropriate changes. In a bizarre twist, when a local television news crew tried to report on the findings from school grounds, school officials confronted them and wrestled a camera away from one of its photographers, injuring him in the process.
The controversy surrounding the founding of New York City's Arabic language public school, Khalil Gibran International Academy, last year continues. Former principal Dhabah "Debbie" Almontaser was asked to step down after publicly defending T-shirts produced by Arab Women Active in the Arts and Media, an organization with whom she shared office space, emblazoned with "Intifada NYC." But KGIA has other troublesome associations. Its advisory board includes three imams, one of whom, New York University Imam Khalid Latif, sent a threatening letter to the university's president regarding a planned display of the Danish cartoons. Another, Shamsi Ali, runs the Jamaica Muslim Center Quranic Memorization School in Queens, a replica of the type of Pakistani madrassa (or school) counter-terrorism officials have been warning about since 9/11. Accordingly, several parents founded Stop the Madrassa: A Community Coalition to voice their contention that KGIA is an inappropriate candidate for taxpayer funding.
Equally problematic are the textbooks used in American public schools to teach Islam or Islamic history. Organizations such as Southern California's Council on Islamic Education and Arabic World and Islamic Resources are tasked with screening and editing these textbooks for public school districts, but questions have been raised about the groups' scholarship and ideological agenda. The American Textbook Council, an organization that reviews history and social studies textbooks used in American schools, and its director, Gilbert T. Sewall, have produced a series of articles and reports on Islam textbooks and the findings are damning. They include textbooks that are factually inaccurate, misrepresent and in some cases, glorify Islam, or are hostile to other religions. While teaching students about Islam within a religious studies context may be appropriate, the purpose becomes suspect when the texts involved are compromised in this manner.
Such are the complaints about "History Alive! The Medieval World and Beyond," a textbook published by the Teachers' Curriculum Institute, to the point where parents in the Scottsdale, Ariz., school district succeeded in having it removed from the curriculum in 2005. TCI is based in Mountain View, and the textbook is now being used in the state's public schools, where similar concerns have arisen. A Marin County mother whose son has been assigned "History Alive!" has been trying to mount an effort to call school officials' attention to the problem. Similarly, a San Luis Obispo mother filed an official complaint several years ago with her son's school authorities over the use of Houghton Mifflin's middle school text, "Across the Centuries," which has been widely criticized for whitewashing Islamic history and glorifying Islam. Its recent approval for use in Montgomery County, Md., public schools is likely to lead to further objections.
But the forces in opposition are powerful and plenty. They include public education bureaucrats and teachers mired in naivete and political correctness, biased textbook publishers, politicized professors and other experts tasked with helping states approve textbooks, and at the top of the heap, billions of dollars in Saudi funding. These funds are pouring into the coffers of various organs that design K-12 curricula. The resultant material, not coincidentally, turns out to be inaccurate, biased and, considering the Wahhabist strain of Islam promulgated by Saudi Arabia, dangerous. And again, taxpayer dollars are involved. National Review Online contributing editor Stanley Kurtz explains :
"The United States government gives money — and a federal seal of approval — to a university Middle East Studies center. That center offers a government-approved K-12 Middle East studies curriculum to America's teachers. But in fact, that curriculum has been bought and paid for by the Saudis, who may even have trained the personnel who operate the university's outreach program. Meanwhile, the American government is asleep at the wheel — paying scant attention to how its federally mandated public outreach programs actually work. So without ever realizing it, America's taxpayers end up subsidizing — and providing official federal approval for — K-12 educational materials on the Middle East that have been created under Saudi auspices. Game, set, match: Saudis."
Along with funding textbooks and curricula, the Saudis are also involved in funding and designing training for public school teachers. The Saudi funded Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding at Georgetown University now offers professional development workshops for K-12 teachers. The workshops take place at the hosting institution and provide teachers with classroom material. They are free of charge and ACMCU throws in lunch to boot.
But this generosity likely comes with a catch, for the center is known for producing scholars and material with a decidedly apologist bent, both toward the Saudi Royal Family and Islamic radicalism. It's no accident that ACMCU education consultant Susan Douglass, according to her bio, has been "an affiliated scholar" with the Council on Islamic Education "for over a decade." Douglass also taught social studies at the Islamic Saudi Academy in Fairfax, Va., where her husband still teaches. ISA has come under investigation for Saudi-provided textbooks and curriculum that some have alleged promotes hatred and intolerance towards non-Muslims. That someone with Douglass' problematic associations would be in charge of training public school teachers hardly inspires confidence in the system.
While groups such as People for the American Way, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, and the ACLU express outrage at any semblance of Christianity in America's public schools, very little clamor has met the emergence of Islam in the same arena. An occasional press release, such as the one put out by the Minnesota chapter of the ACLU regarding TIZA, will surface, but by and large, the arbiters of separation of church and state or in this case, mosque and state, have gone silent. The same can largely be said for the federal government and, in particular, the State Department. No doubt, Saudi dollars and influence are part of the problem.
Probably the single greatest weapon in the arsenal of those trying to fight the misuse of America's public schools is community involvement. As noted previously, a number of parental coalitions have sprung up across the country in an effort to protect their own children from indoctrination. The Stop the Madrassa Coalition has expanded its efforts beyond New York City by working on policy ideas for legislation and meeting privately with members of Congress. Also providing hope are Rep. Sue Myrick (R-N.C.), whose 10-point "Wake Up America" agenda includes a call to reform Saudi-provided textbooks, and the bipartisan Congressional Anti-Terrorism Caucus she co-chairs. Its focus on "jihadist ideology" demonstrates an all-too-rare governmental understanding of the nature of the current conflict.
The power to educate the next generation is an inestimable one and a free society cedes control at its peril. The days of the "silent majority" are no longer tenable in the face of a determined and clever enemy. The battle of ideas must be joined.
Cinnamon Stillwell is a San Francisco writer. She can be reached at cinnamonstillwell@yahoo.com. She also writes for the blog at campus-watch.org.
Link to article
Islam in America's public schools: Education or indoctrination?
Cinnamon Stillwell
Wednesday, June 11, 2008
With fatal terrorist attacks on the decline worldwide and al Qaeda apparently in disarray, it would seem a time for optimism in the global war on terrorism. But the war has simply shifted to a different arena. Islamists, or those who believe that Islam is a political and religious system that must dominate all others, are focusing less on the military and more on the ideological. It turns out that Western liberal democracies can be subverted without firing a shot.
Nowhere is this more evident than in the educational realm. Islamists have taken what's come to be known as the "soft jihad" into America's classrooms and children in K-12 are the first casualties. Whether it is textbooks, curriculum, classroom exercises, film screenings, speakers or teacher training, public education in America is under assault.
Capitalizing on the post-9/11 demand for Arabic instruction, some public, charter and voucher-funded private schools are inappropriately using taxpayer dollars to implement a religious curriculum. They are also bringing in outside speakers with Islamist ties or sympathies. As a result, not only are children receiving a biased education, but possible violations of the First Amendment's Establishment Clause abound. Consider the following cases:
Last month, students at Friendswood Junior High in Houston were required to attend an "Islamic Awareness" presentation during class time allotted for physical education. The presentation involved two representatives from the Council on American-Islamic Relations, an organization with a record of Islamist statements and terrorism convictions. According to students, they were taught that "there is one God, his name is Allah" and that "Adam, Noah and Jesus are prophets." Students were also taught about the Five Pillars of Islam and how to pray five times a day and wear Islamic religious garb. Parents were not notified about the presentation and it wasn't until a number of complaints arose that school officials responded with an apologetic e-mail.
Earlier this year at Lake Brantley High School in Seminole County, Fla., speakers from the Academy for Learning Islam gave a presentation to students about "cultural diversity" that extended to a detailed discussion of the Quran and Islam. The school neither screened the ALI speakers nor notified parents. After a number of complaints, local media coverage and a subsequent investigation, the school district apologized for the inappropriate presentation, admitting that it violated the law. Subsequently, ALI was removed from the Seminole County school system's Dividends and Speaker's Bureau.
As reported by the Cabinet Press, a school project last year at Amherst Middle School transformed "the quaint colonial town of Amherst, N.H., into a Saudi Arabian Bedouin tent community." Male and female students were segregated, with the girls hosting "hijab and veil stations" and handing out the oppressive head-to-toe black garment known as the abaya to female guests. Meanwhile, the boys hosted food and Arabic dancing stations because, as explained in the article, "the traditions of Saudi Arabia at this time prevent women from participating in these public roles." An "Islamic religion station" offered up a prayer rug, verses from the Quran, prayer items and a compass pointed towards Mecca. The fact that female subjugation was presented as a benign cultural practice and Islamic religious rituals were promoted with public funds is cause for concern.
Tarek ibn Ziyad Academy, a charter school in Inver Grove Heights, Minn., came under recent scrutiny after Minneapolis Star-Tribune columnist Katherine Kersten brought to light concerns about public funding for its overtly religious curriculum. The school is housed in the Muslim American Society's (the American branch of the Egyptian Islamist group the Muslim Brotherhood) Minnesota building, alongside a mosque, and the daily routine includes prayer, ritual washing, halal food preparation and an after-school "Islamic studies" program. Kersten's columns prompted the Minnesota chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union to issue a press release expressing its own reservations about potential First Amendment violations. An investigation initiated by the Minnesota Department of Education verified several of Kersten's allegations and the school has since promised to make the appropriate changes. In a bizarre twist, when a local television news crew tried to report on the findings from school grounds, school officials confronted them and wrestled a camera away from one of its photographers, injuring him in the process.
The controversy surrounding the founding of New York City's Arabic language public school, Khalil Gibran International Academy, last year continues. Former principal Dhabah "Debbie" Almontaser was asked to step down after publicly defending T-shirts produced by Arab Women Active in the Arts and Media, an organization with whom she shared office space, emblazoned with "Intifada NYC." But KGIA has other troublesome associations. Its advisory board includes three imams, one of whom, New York University Imam Khalid Latif, sent a threatening letter to the university's president regarding a planned display of the Danish cartoons. Another, Shamsi Ali, runs the Jamaica Muslim Center Quranic Memorization School in Queens, a replica of the type of Pakistani madrassa (or school) counter-terrorism officials have been warning about since 9/11. Accordingly, several parents founded Stop the Madrassa: A Community Coalition to voice their contention that KGIA is an inappropriate candidate for taxpayer funding.
Equally problematic are the textbooks used in American public schools to teach Islam or Islamic history. Organizations such as Southern California's Council on Islamic Education and Arabic World and Islamic Resources are tasked with screening and editing these textbooks for public school districts, but questions have been raised about the groups' scholarship and ideological agenda. The American Textbook Council, an organization that reviews history and social studies textbooks used in American schools, and its director, Gilbert T. Sewall, have produced a series of articles and reports on Islam textbooks and the findings are damning. They include textbooks that are factually inaccurate, misrepresent and in some cases, glorify Islam, or are hostile to other religions. While teaching students about Islam within a religious studies context may be appropriate, the purpose becomes suspect when the texts involved are compromised in this manner.
Such are the complaints about "History Alive! The Medieval World and Beyond," a textbook published by the Teachers' Curriculum Institute, to the point where parents in the Scottsdale, Ariz., school district succeeded in having it removed from the curriculum in 2005. TCI is based in Mountain View, and the textbook is now being used in the state's public schools, where similar concerns have arisen. A Marin County mother whose son has been assigned "History Alive!" has been trying to mount an effort to call school officials' attention to the problem. Similarly, a San Luis Obispo mother filed an official complaint several years ago with her son's school authorities over the use of Houghton Mifflin's middle school text, "Across the Centuries," which has been widely criticized for whitewashing Islamic history and glorifying Islam. Its recent approval for use in Montgomery County, Md., public schools is likely to lead to further objections.
But the forces in opposition are powerful and plenty. They include public education bureaucrats and teachers mired in naivete and political correctness, biased textbook publishers, politicized professors and other experts tasked with helping states approve textbooks, and at the top of the heap, billions of dollars in Saudi funding. These funds are pouring into the coffers of various organs that design K-12 curricula. The resultant material, not coincidentally, turns out to be inaccurate, biased and, considering the Wahhabist strain of Islam promulgated by Saudi Arabia, dangerous. And again, taxpayer dollars are involved. National Review Online contributing editor Stanley Kurtz explains :
"The United States government gives money — and a federal seal of approval — to a university Middle East Studies center. That center offers a government-approved K-12 Middle East studies curriculum to America's teachers. But in fact, that curriculum has been bought and paid for by the Saudis, who may even have trained the personnel who operate the university's outreach program. Meanwhile, the American government is asleep at the wheel — paying scant attention to how its federally mandated public outreach programs actually work. So without ever realizing it, America's taxpayers end up subsidizing — and providing official federal approval for — K-12 educational materials on the Middle East that have been created under Saudi auspices. Game, set, match: Saudis."
Along with funding textbooks and curricula, the Saudis are also involved in funding and designing training for public school teachers. The Saudi funded Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding at Georgetown University now offers professional development workshops for K-12 teachers. The workshops take place at the hosting institution and provide teachers with classroom material. They are free of charge and ACMCU throws in lunch to boot.
But this generosity likely comes with a catch, for the center is known for producing scholars and material with a decidedly apologist bent, both toward the Saudi Royal Family and Islamic radicalism. It's no accident that ACMCU education consultant Susan Douglass, according to her bio, has been "an affiliated scholar" with the Council on Islamic Education "for over a decade." Douglass also taught social studies at the Islamic Saudi Academy in Fairfax, Va., where her husband still teaches. ISA has come under investigation for Saudi-provided textbooks and curriculum that some have alleged promotes hatred and intolerance towards non-Muslims. That someone with Douglass' problematic associations would be in charge of training public school teachers hardly inspires confidence in the system.
While groups such as People for the American Way, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, and the ACLU express outrage at any semblance of Christianity in America's public schools, very little clamor has met the emergence of Islam in the same arena. An occasional press release, such as the one put out by the Minnesota chapter of the ACLU regarding TIZA, will surface, but by and large, the arbiters of separation of church and state or in this case, mosque and state, have gone silent. The same can largely be said for the federal government and, in particular, the State Department. No doubt, Saudi dollars and influence are part of the problem.
Probably the single greatest weapon in the arsenal of those trying to fight the misuse of America's public schools is community involvement. As noted previously, a number of parental coalitions have sprung up across the country in an effort to protect their own children from indoctrination. The Stop the Madrassa Coalition has expanded its efforts beyond New York City by working on policy ideas for legislation and meeting privately with members of Congress. Also providing hope are Rep. Sue Myrick (R-N.C.), whose 10-point "Wake Up America" agenda includes a call to reform Saudi-provided textbooks, and the bipartisan Congressional Anti-Terrorism Caucus she co-chairs. Its focus on "jihadist ideology" demonstrates an all-too-rare governmental understanding of the nature of the current conflict.
The power to educate the next generation is an inestimable one and a free society cedes control at its peril. The days of the "silent majority" are no longer tenable in the face of a determined and clever enemy. The battle of ideas must be joined.
Cinnamon Stillwell is a San Francisco writer. She can be reached at cinnamonstillwell@yahoo.com. She also writes for the blog at campus-watch.org.
Link to article
Tuesday, June 3, 2008
No Bible Zone-U.K.
I have been told that Muslims were coming into the West for the freedoms here. If this were true then why are they slowly turning the West into the Middle East part 2, as they form their own communities in non Islamic countries and start enforcing their own rules? The answer is simple, they do not respect non-Muslims and have no intentions of assimilating.
You can't preach the Bible here, this is a Muslim area.
(What a community policeman told two Christians)
By Steve Doughty and Andy Dolan
Last updated at 7:04 PM on 02nd June 2008
Two Christian preachers were stopped from handing out Bible extracts by police because they were in a Muslim area, it was claimed yesterday.
They say they were told by a Muslim police community support officer that they could not preach there and that attempting to convert Muslims to Christianity was a hate crime.
The community officer is also said to have told the two men: 'You have been warned. If you come back here and get beat up, well, you have been warned.'
A police constable who was present during the incident in the Alum Rock area of Birmingham is also alleged to have told the preachers not to return to the district.
It comes amid growing concern over the development of Islamic 'no-go areas'.
The preachers, Americans Arthur Cunningham and Joseph Abraham, are demanding an apology and compensation from West Midlands Police.
They say their treatment breaks the Human Rights Act, which guarantees freedom of religious expression.
The preachers, who have the backing of the Christian Institute pressure group, say they will take the force to court for breaching their human rights if they don't receive an apology.
They have accused the officer, PCSO Naeem Naguthney, of behaving in an 'aggressive and threatening' manner. A complaint by their lawyers said he interrupted as they spoke to Muslim youths about their beliefs.
Mr Abraham, 65, who was born a Muslim in Egypt and is a convert to Christianity, said: 'He told us we were trying to convert Muslims to Christianity and that that was a hate crime.
'He was very intimidating and it concerns me that somebody holding his views can become a police officer, albeit at PCSO level.'
Mr Cunningham, 48, a fellow American Baptist missionary, said: 'He realised we were Americans and then started ranting at us about George Bush and American foreign policy.
'He said we were in a Muslim area and were not allowed to spread our Christian message. He said he was going to take us to the police station.'
Mr Cunningham added: 'I am dumfounded that the police seem so nonchalant. They seem content not to make it clear that what we were doing was perfectly legal. This is a free country and to suggest we were guilty of a hate crime for spreading God's word is outrageous.'
According to a complaint by the men's lawyers, Mr Naguthney summoned two other officers in support, one of whom, a full constable, is said to have told the men not to return to the area.
Mr Naguthney, 30, was recruited as a community support officer last year after being unemployed for eight months.
Earlier this year, he had a prominent role at a conference to launch the West Midlands branch of the National Association of Muslim Police. He gave a reading from the Koran before the audience heard a recorded contribution from Gordon Brown, a speech from Home Office Minister Tony McNulty, and contributions from several chief constables.
Mr Naguthney declined to discuss the row.
His brother, Nadeem, said: 'Naeem is a community man, that is why he joined the police.'
The Alum Rock area was at the heart of a terrorism inquiry last year, which ended with the conviction of local resident Parviz Khan for plotting to kidnap and behead a British soldier.
A senior Church of England bishop, the Right Reverend Michael Nazir-Ali, warned recently that it is hard for non-Muslims to live and work in some areas where radicals and clerics are trying to impose an Islamic character.
A West Midlands Police spokesman said an investigation into the complaint had concluded that the PCSO had acted 'with the best of intentions' when he 'intervened to diffuse a heated argument between two groups of men'.
A statement added: 'Following this investigation, the PCSO has been offered guidance about what constitutes a hate crime and advice on communication style.'
Link to article
More on Muslim Disrespect of Christians in the U.K.
Muslim worker refuses to sell unclean Bible
You can't preach the Bible here, this is a Muslim area.
(What a community policeman told two Christians)
By Steve Doughty and Andy Dolan
Last updated at 7:04 PM on 02nd June 2008
Two Christian preachers were stopped from handing out Bible extracts by police because they were in a Muslim area, it was claimed yesterday.
They say they were told by a Muslim police community support officer that they could not preach there and that attempting to convert Muslims to Christianity was a hate crime.
The community officer is also said to have told the two men: 'You have been warned. If you come back here and get beat up, well, you have been warned.'
A police constable who was present during the incident in the Alum Rock area of Birmingham is also alleged to have told the preachers not to return to the district.
It comes amid growing concern over the development of Islamic 'no-go areas'.
The preachers, Americans Arthur Cunningham and Joseph Abraham, are demanding an apology and compensation from West Midlands Police.
They say their treatment breaks the Human Rights Act, which guarantees freedom of religious expression.
The preachers, who have the backing of the Christian Institute pressure group, say they will take the force to court for breaching their human rights if they don't receive an apology.
They have accused the officer, PCSO Naeem Naguthney, of behaving in an 'aggressive and threatening' manner. A complaint by their lawyers said he interrupted as they spoke to Muslim youths about their beliefs.
Mr Abraham, 65, who was born a Muslim in Egypt and is a convert to Christianity, said: 'He told us we were trying to convert Muslims to Christianity and that that was a hate crime.
'He was very intimidating and it concerns me that somebody holding his views can become a police officer, albeit at PCSO level.'
Mr Cunningham, 48, a fellow American Baptist missionary, said: 'He realised we were Americans and then started ranting at us about George Bush and American foreign policy.
'He said we were in a Muslim area and were not allowed to spread our Christian message. He said he was going to take us to the police station.'
Mr Cunningham added: 'I am dumfounded that the police seem so nonchalant. They seem content not to make it clear that what we were doing was perfectly legal. This is a free country and to suggest we were guilty of a hate crime for spreading God's word is outrageous.'
According to a complaint by the men's lawyers, Mr Naguthney summoned two other officers in support, one of whom, a full constable, is said to have told the men not to return to the area.
Mr Naguthney, 30, was recruited as a community support officer last year after being unemployed for eight months.
Earlier this year, he had a prominent role at a conference to launch the West Midlands branch of the National Association of Muslim Police. He gave a reading from the Koran before the audience heard a recorded contribution from Gordon Brown, a speech from Home Office Minister Tony McNulty, and contributions from several chief constables.
Mr Naguthney declined to discuss the row.
His brother, Nadeem, said: 'Naeem is a community man, that is why he joined the police.'
The Alum Rock area was at the heart of a terrorism inquiry last year, which ended with the conviction of local resident Parviz Khan for plotting to kidnap and behead a British soldier.
A senior Church of England bishop, the Right Reverend Michael Nazir-Ali, warned recently that it is hard for non-Muslims to live and work in some areas where radicals and clerics are trying to impose an Islamic character.
A West Midlands Police spokesman said an investigation into the complaint had concluded that the PCSO had acted 'with the best of intentions' when he 'intervened to diffuse a heated argument between two groups of men'.
A statement added: 'Following this investigation, the PCSO has been offered guidance about what constitutes a hate crime and advice on communication style.'
Link to article
More on Muslim Disrespect of Christians in the U.K.
Muslim worker refuses to sell unclean Bible
Friday, May 30, 2008
A Message From Ali Sina
What is Wrong with Bouchard-Taylor Report
by Ali Sina
The 3.7 m. dollar Bouchard-Taylor report that was commissioned to recommend
\"reasonable accommodations\" of ethnic and religious
minorities in Quebec is finally released. However, it raises more questions
that it answers.
This intellectual duo*, who spent months preparing the 310 page report, wants
to place more emphasis on integration and less on individuation that would
eventually lead to segregation and alienation. That is a noble thought. The
problem is that right after talking about the importance of integration they
propose “dissemination of pluralism.”
Aren’t integration and pluralism two opposing concepts? In politics we need
pluralism or we will have dictatorship. But in society, we need integration..
Pluralism leads to isolationism, alienation and estrangement. What glues a
nation together, are its shared values. Culture, tradition, beliefs and
language are values that bind us together. If we have nothing in common, what
will unite us?
Is cultural pluralism a good thing? Do all cultures have inherently something
good to offer? Is, for example, a culture that advocates hatred of outsiders
and gender apartheid, equal to a culture that promotes inclusiveness and
equality?
One of the recommendations of the Bouchard-Taylor report is “intercultural
harmonization.” How can we promote pluralism and harmonization at the same
time? Aren’t these two concepts mutually exclusive?
Mr. Taylor, says, “Compromise and reciprocity are the two key words. You give
a little bit, I give a little bit, and we all put some water in our wine.”
This works only when the other side also believes in compromise and
reciprocity, is willing to give in and put some water in his wine. If he is not
willing to compromise, the only wine that will be watered down will be the wine
of the Western culture.
Some cultures do not compromise. Take the example of Islam. Islam is now
culture, now religion, now political system and now race. It can be anything,
depending on the situation. However, Islam cannot change. You cannot water it
down, reform it or modernize it. The Quran is emphatic that Islam is perfect
(Q: 5:3). No Muslim will tolerate reforming his religion that was perfected by
God. Consequently, the only culture that will have to give in to the point of
extinction will be the Western culture.
It is this culture that gave birth to enlightenment, democracy and ushered
mankind to modernity. It is this culture that brought the collective humanity
out of the Dark Ages into the present world. It is to this culture that we owe
our freedom. If any culture has to be protected it is the Western culture. Yet,
it is this culture alone that today is facing extinction – because it is being
watered down through immigration, multiculturalism and the suicidal disinterest
of its members, who are willing to bend backwards to accommodate every inferior
culture except protecting their own.
Other recommendations of the commission are to take “exceptional measures to
combat Islamophobia and anti-Semitism.” They also recommend fighting against
discrimination, with emphasis on hate crimes.
However, these recommendations are contradictory. There are some teachings of
Islam that are anti-Semitic, misogynist, hateful and discriminatory. How then
can we reconcile these two conflicting recommendations?
The Quran repeatedly calls the Jews apes and swine, and says they are despised
and rejected (2:65, 5:60, 7:166). Every day, Muslims are required to recite the
opening sura of the Quran that says Christians and Jews have gone astray and
that the wrath of God will be on them. According to the Quran, women are
inferior (4.32) and should their husband suspect disobedience, they can abuse
them verbally and emotionally, and even beat them (4.34). The Quran says
homosexuality is abomination (27:54) and the Sharia (Islamic law) prescribes
death for homosexuals. According to the Sharia, apostates also should be
killed. The Quran is insistent that the non-Muslims are unclean (9:28), that
Muslims should not take them as friends (3:28), associate with them (9:23), or
obey them as rulers (25:52).
There are many verses in the Quran that exhort the believers to be harsh with
non-Muslims (9:73), fight them (2:193, 2:216, 4:84, 8:65, 9:5, 9:14, 9:73),
cast terror into their hearts (3:151, 8:12), and even kill them (2:191, 9:5,
47:4).
Are we allowed to criticize these teachings? Not according to Bouchard and
Taylor who want us to be charged with Islamophobia if we do. But if we don’t,
we would be tolerating anti-Semitism, discrimination against women and hate
against all non Muslims.
A fact that seems to escape everyone is that Islam is not a race but a belief
system. Beliefs do not have to be protected by law. Christianity is not
protected, Judaism is not protected, Hinduism, Buddhism, Sikhism, the Bahai
Faith, Paganism, Shintoism… none of these faiths are protected. Anyone is
free to criticize any religion. Then why Islam has to be protected by law? Why
the government should spend the tax money of the very people Islam calls
filthy, apes and pigs to protect it? The government’s responsibility is to
protect people, their rights and their lives and not religious beliefs. It is
the lives of the apostates of Islam that are in danger and need to be
protected, not Islam that says kill the apostates.
How can we compare Islamophobia with anti-Semitism? Semites are a people; Islam
is a belief. These are apples and oranges. People need protection; beliefs
don’t. It’s human rights that have to be protected, not human faiths.
Then again, Islamophobia is a misnomer. Phobia is an unfounded and irrational
fear. Since 9/11, 2001, there have been over 11,000 terrorist attacks
throughout the world, all perpetrated by the followers of “the religion of
peace.” On Feb. 13, 2007, the CBC published the results of an Environics
poll, where fully 12% of Canadian Muslims said the aborted terrorist plot –
that included kidnapping and beheading the Canadian prime minister and blowing
up the Parliament and the CBC – was justified. 12% of 700,000 Muslims living
in Canada means 84,000 Canadian Muslims support terrorism. They finance it;
they take part in it.
Can we afford not to fear Islam? Is the fear of Islam, phobia? One must be
foolhardy not to fear Islam. Read the Quran! Listen to the sermons in the
mosques and pay attention to what Muslims do. Are these not enough reasons to
fear Islam?
The truth is that Islam is incompatible with human rights, gender equality,
democracy, integration, harmonization and everything that the Bouchard-Taylor
commission intends to achieve. Muslims will never integrate, unless they give
up Islam and consider themselves Canadians first. It is ironic that these two
highly intellectual men undermine their own recommendations and include Islam
as something to be protected. On one hand they want to promote secularism and
recommend the religious symbols of the founders, and the majority of the
Quebecois to be taken down from public buildings, and on the other hand they
suggest that government should shield Islam from criticism and incriminate
those who speak against its violent, discriminatory, and hate mongering
teachings.
Two thousand years ago, a Jewish carpenter said, “truth will set you free..”
This truism has never been truer than today. Let us stop this political
correctness. Let us tell the truth about Islam. Let us give truth a chance.
__
* Gérard Bouchard is a Historian and sociologist lecturer in the Département
des sciences humaines at the Université du Québec à Chicoutimi.
Charles Taylor, author, philosopher, is Professor Emeritus of Political Science
and Philosophy at McGill University.
Who is Ali Sina?
Ali Sina
Pick up Mr. Sinas new book.
Understanding Muhammad A Psychobiography
by Ali Sina
The 3.7 m. dollar Bouchard-Taylor report that was commissioned to recommend
\"reasonable accommodations\" of ethnic and religious
minorities in Quebec is finally released. However, it raises more questions
that it answers.
This intellectual duo*, who spent months preparing the 310 page report, wants
to place more emphasis on integration and less on individuation that would
eventually lead to segregation and alienation. That is a noble thought. The
problem is that right after talking about the importance of integration they
propose “dissemination of pluralism.”
Aren’t integration and pluralism two opposing concepts? In politics we need
pluralism or we will have dictatorship. But in society, we need integration..
Pluralism leads to isolationism, alienation and estrangement. What glues a
nation together, are its shared values. Culture, tradition, beliefs and
language are values that bind us together. If we have nothing in common, what
will unite us?
Is cultural pluralism a good thing? Do all cultures have inherently something
good to offer? Is, for example, a culture that advocates hatred of outsiders
and gender apartheid, equal to a culture that promotes inclusiveness and
equality?
One of the recommendations of the Bouchard-Taylor report is “intercultural
harmonization.” How can we promote pluralism and harmonization at the same
time? Aren’t these two concepts mutually exclusive?
Mr. Taylor, says, “Compromise and reciprocity are the two key words. You give
a little bit, I give a little bit, and we all put some water in our wine.”
This works only when the other side also believes in compromise and
reciprocity, is willing to give in and put some water in his wine. If he is not
willing to compromise, the only wine that will be watered down will be the wine
of the Western culture.
Some cultures do not compromise. Take the example of Islam. Islam is now
culture, now religion, now political system and now race. It can be anything,
depending on the situation. However, Islam cannot change. You cannot water it
down, reform it or modernize it. The Quran is emphatic that Islam is perfect
(Q: 5:3). No Muslim will tolerate reforming his religion that was perfected by
God. Consequently, the only culture that will have to give in to the point of
extinction will be the Western culture.
It is this culture that gave birth to enlightenment, democracy and ushered
mankind to modernity. It is this culture that brought the collective humanity
out of the Dark Ages into the present world. It is to this culture that we owe
our freedom. If any culture has to be protected it is the Western culture. Yet,
it is this culture alone that today is facing extinction – because it is being
watered down through immigration, multiculturalism and the suicidal disinterest
of its members, who are willing to bend backwards to accommodate every inferior
culture except protecting their own.
Other recommendations of the commission are to take “exceptional measures to
combat Islamophobia and anti-Semitism.” They also recommend fighting against
discrimination, with emphasis on hate crimes.
However, these recommendations are contradictory. There are some teachings of
Islam that are anti-Semitic, misogynist, hateful and discriminatory. How then
can we reconcile these two conflicting recommendations?
The Quran repeatedly calls the Jews apes and swine, and says they are despised
and rejected (2:65, 5:60, 7:166). Every day, Muslims are required to recite the
opening sura of the Quran that says Christians and Jews have gone astray and
that the wrath of God will be on them. According to the Quran, women are
inferior (4.32) and should their husband suspect disobedience, they can abuse
them verbally and emotionally, and even beat them (4.34). The Quran says
homosexuality is abomination (27:54) and the Sharia (Islamic law) prescribes
death for homosexuals. According to the Sharia, apostates also should be
killed. The Quran is insistent that the non-Muslims are unclean (9:28), that
Muslims should not take them as friends (3:28), associate with them (9:23), or
obey them as rulers (25:52).
There are many verses in the Quran that exhort the believers to be harsh with
non-Muslims (9:73), fight them (2:193, 2:216, 4:84, 8:65, 9:5, 9:14, 9:73),
cast terror into their hearts (3:151, 8:12), and even kill them (2:191, 9:5,
47:4).
Are we allowed to criticize these teachings? Not according to Bouchard and
Taylor who want us to be charged with Islamophobia if we do. But if we don’t,
we would be tolerating anti-Semitism, discrimination against women and hate
against all non Muslims.
A fact that seems to escape everyone is that Islam is not a race but a belief
system. Beliefs do not have to be protected by law. Christianity is not
protected, Judaism is not protected, Hinduism, Buddhism, Sikhism, the Bahai
Faith, Paganism, Shintoism… none of these faiths are protected. Anyone is
free to criticize any religion. Then why Islam has to be protected by law? Why
the government should spend the tax money of the very people Islam calls
filthy, apes and pigs to protect it? The government’s responsibility is to
protect people, their rights and their lives and not religious beliefs. It is
the lives of the apostates of Islam that are in danger and need to be
protected, not Islam that says kill the apostates.
How can we compare Islamophobia with anti-Semitism? Semites are a people; Islam
is a belief. These are apples and oranges. People need protection; beliefs
don’t. It’s human rights that have to be protected, not human faiths.
Then again, Islamophobia is a misnomer. Phobia is an unfounded and irrational
fear. Since 9/11, 2001, there have been over 11,000 terrorist attacks
throughout the world, all perpetrated by the followers of “the religion of
peace.” On Feb. 13, 2007, the CBC published the results of an Environics
poll, where fully 12% of Canadian Muslims said the aborted terrorist plot –
that included kidnapping and beheading the Canadian prime minister and blowing
up the Parliament and the CBC – was justified. 12% of 700,000 Muslims living
in Canada means 84,000 Canadian Muslims support terrorism. They finance it;
they take part in it.
Can we afford not to fear Islam? Is the fear of Islam, phobia? One must be
foolhardy not to fear Islam. Read the Quran! Listen to the sermons in the
mosques and pay attention to what Muslims do. Are these not enough reasons to
fear Islam?
The truth is that Islam is incompatible with human rights, gender equality,
democracy, integration, harmonization and everything that the Bouchard-Taylor
commission intends to achieve. Muslims will never integrate, unless they give
up Islam and consider themselves Canadians first. It is ironic that these two
highly intellectual men undermine their own recommendations and include Islam
as something to be protected. On one hand they want to promote secularism and
recommend the religious symbols of the founders, and the majority of the
Quebecois to be taken down from public buildings, and on the other hand they
suggest that government should shield Islam from criticism and incriminate
those who speak against its violent, discriminatory, and hate mongering
teachings.
Two thousand years ago, a Jewish carpenter said, “truth will set you free..”
This truism has never been truer than today. Let us stop this political
correctness. Let us tell the truth about Islam. Let us give truth a chance.
__
* Gérard Bouchard is a Historian and sociologist lecturer in the Département
des sciences humaines at the Université du Québec à Chicoutimi.
Charles Taylor, author, philosopher, is Professor Emeritus of Political Science
and Philosophy at McGill University.
Who is Ali Sina?
Ali Sina
Pick up Mr. Sinas new book.
Understanding Muhammad A Psychobiography
Sunday, May 25, 2008
Italian Resistance, Mosque Crackdown!!
When in Rome, do not ask for Mosque construction is the new slogan coming out of Italy these days. As I predicted a few years ago, the lawful backlash towards the Islamic push for world conquest has started in Europe. Once again, the Muslim man speaking in this article, shows the one way street that Islam is. He wants to get Islamic countries to pressure Italy to allow Mosque construction. Excuse me aren't these the same Islamic countries that persecute Christians, Jews and all other forms of religion across the world? It is always a one way street with the Islamic world. They deserve the same amount of respect as they give, which is none. Which is now what they are getting in Italy.
Sunday, 25 May 2008 12:30 Pakistan Daily
Italy's far-right, anti-immigrant Northern League party has started its mission in the new government with bringing down a mosque in the northern city of Verona.
"[The mosque destruction] reinforces Muslim fears of seeing the League in the ruling coalition," Ali Abu Shwaima, the head of Milan-based Islamic Centre, told.
Bulldozers brought down last week a building housing a Muslim prayer room in the city.
"I never felt at ease with this mosque," Elisonder Antonneli, the head of Verona city council, said.
"This place will be turned into a park and a car parking space and will be named after (Italian writer) Oriana Fallaci."
Fallaci, who died in 2006, was notorious for anti-Islam stances.
Following the 9/11 attacks, the far-right writer published a book entitled "Rage and Pride" in which she ridiculed the Noble Qur'an.
She has also authored another book "The Force of Reason" in which she warned that Europe was turning into "an Islamic province, an Islamic colony" and that "to believe that a good Islam and a bad Islam exist goes against all reason."
The Northern League has four ministers in Silovio Berlusconi's government, including the portfolio of the Interior.
The League grabbed 8 percent of the vote in last month's general elections, securing Berlusconi's right-wing coalition a comfortable majority in the parliament.
The party has nearly doubled its parliamentary strength from 4.5 percent two years ago.
The Northern League is widely accused of racism with many critics calling it the BNP of Italy, a reference to the British right-wing party.
Its election campaign played on issues such as immigration crime and economic and cultural fears from immigration.
Hard Time
Abu Shwaima, the Muslim leader, said Italian Muslims will face hard times under the far-right league.
"We believe the life of Italian Muslims will get more complicated," he said.
He said Muslims in the city of Verona used to find spiritual comfort at the razed mosque.
"The mosque destruction is sign of spiraling Islamophobia in many European countries," he said.
There are nearly 20,000 Muslims in Verona.
"I used to pray in the mosque for years," an Italian Muslim in Verona told IOL, requesting anonymity.
"But this Friday I went to the mosque for prayers but I could not as it was razed.
"We live in a state of anticipation and fear after the mosque was destroyed and we want Arab and Muslim governments to pile pressures on Italy to stop anti-immigrant and anti-Islam policies."
Abu Shwaima, the Muslim leader, has a similar message.
"We want to tell the Muslim world that mosques' construction in Italy is almost a mission impossible.
"Except for the Milan-based Islamic Center and the Rome mosque, there are no real mosques in Italy."
Last November, former Italian deputy Education Minister and League member Mariella Mazzetto angered Muslims after parading a pig on the site of a planned mosque in the northern city of Padua.
Two months earlier, League senator Roberto Calderoli called for a "Pig Day" protest against the mosque construction in the northern city of Bologna.
In 2006, protesters left a pig's head at a mosque building site in the central Italian city of Tuscany.
Italy has a Muslim population of some 1.2 million, including 20,000 reverts, according to unofficial estimates.
Link to article
If this situation ever comes to your town....
Buy a pig
Please do not abuse the pig.
Wednesday, May 14, 2008
It's Only a Few.....That's What They Keep Telling us
Those that follow the worldwide problem of Islam, continually hear the popular "it's only a few" excuse by the Islamic apologists. Well, I beg to differ. Lets finally put that excuse to rest.
If it were only a "few", then how can these facts be explained?
TURKEY:Landslide win for Islamic party in Turkey
ANKARA, Turkey -- A party with deep Islamic roots has won a landslide victory in Turkey's elections -- a win that would allow it to rule without a coalition and amend the constitution if it receives enough seats in parliament.
To view full article
Since they have taken control they are slowly moving Turkey away from being a secular nation.
Turkey's parliament has approved a constitutional amendment that would ease the ban on women wearing Islamic headscarves in universities. The ban has been strictly enforced on campus since 1997 when the staunchly secularist military ousted a government seen as too Islamist.
To view full article
Most recently they are getting stricter and stricter. Just like the rest of the Islamic world.
TURKEY: Law Banning Alcohol, Cigarettes Comes Into Effect
(ANSAmed) - ANKARA, MAY 13 - A new law to overhaul tobacco and alcoholic beverages usage drew fierce criticism from sector representatives, and is seen as another negative factor in Islamist-rooted AKP's record of conservative arrangements. Law No. 5752, which will take effect tomorrow, bans the sale of alcoholic beverages and cigarettes "by breaking its packaging or dividing them." Sector representatives say if implemented, it would mean that the sale of alcoholic beverages by the glass at establishments like restaurants and bars would not be allowed.
To view full article
PALESTINE:Hamas wins Palestinian election
This morning, Hamas leaders announced that they had an "outright majority" in the 132-seat Palestinian Legislative Council. "Hamas has won more than 70 seats in Gaza and the West Bank, which gives it more than 50 percent of the vote," said Ismail Haniyeh, a leader of Hamas.
To view full article
EGYPT:Islamic Terrorist Group Muslim Brotherhood Increases it's Seats in Parliament Five Fold
Egypt is supposed to be our "ally", who we actually give $3 billion a year to.
By MICHAEL SLACKMAN
Published: November 27, 2005
CAIRO, Nov. 27 - The Muslim Brotherhood may be banned, but it has demonstrated in the latest parliamentary elections that it is by far the strongest Egyptian opposition group, trouncing the secular political opposition and weakening the governing party's power monopoly.
Results made public today by the government showed the Brotherhood winning 29 more seats in Saturday's runoff in the second round of parliamentary voting. The group won 47 seats in the first round this month, meaning that with just one more round of elections to go, the Brotherhood already has 76 seats - more than five times its total in the departing Parliament. Because of the group's outlaw status, its candidates run as independents.
To view full article
Lebanon: Islamic Terrorist Group Hezbollah Gains Seats in Lebanese Government
After the 2005 elections, Hezbollah won fourteen seats in the 128-member Lebanese Parliament. In addition, Hezbollah has two ministers in the government, and a third is endorsed by the group.
Hezbollah did not disarm when it entered Lebanese politics, and experts say the group's new political involvement is not an indication that the group is becoming more moderate.
To view full article
The facts show us that we are talking about millions of Muslims
who support Islamic terrorists and are voting them into their governments. Not just a handful or a few as Islamic apologists try to portray. Let's
not kid ourselves, the Islamic world is getting stricter and stricter and they are not our allies. Feel free to use this article in your debates. (Please include my link).
Islamic apologists and excuse makers: Do you care to explain? I will be waiting....
If it were only a "few", then how can these facts be explained?
TURKEY:Landslide win for Islamic party in Turkey
ANKARA, Turkey -- A party with deep Islamic roots has won a landslide victory in Turkey's elections -- a win that would allow it to rule without a coalition and amend the constitution if it receives enough seats in parliament.
To view full article
Since they have taken control they are slowly moving Turkey away from being a secular nation.
Turkey's parliament has approved a constitutional amendment that would ease the ban on women wearing Islamic headscarves in universities. The ban has been strictly enforced on campus since 1997 when the staunchly secularist military ousted a government seen as too Islamist.
To view full article
Most recently they are getting stricter and stricter. Just like the rest of the Islamic world.
TURKEY: Law Banning Alcohol, Cigarettes Comes Into Effect
(ANSAmed) - ANKARA, MAY 13 - A new law to overhaul tobacco and alcoholic beverages usage drew fierce criticism from sector representatives, and is seen as another negative factor in Islamist-rooted AKP's record of conservative arrangements. Law No. 5752, which will take effect tomorrow, bans the sale of alcoholic beverages and cigarettes "by breaking its packaging or dividing them." Sector representatives say if implemented, it would mean that the sale of alcoholic beverages by the glass at establishments like restaurants and bars would not be allowed.
To view full article
PALESTINE:Hamas wins Palestinian election
This morning, Hamas leaders announced that they had an "outright majority" in the 132-seat Palestinian Legislative Council. "Hamas has won more than 70 seats in Gaza and the West Bank, which gives it more than 50 percent of the vote," said Ismail Haniyeh, a leader of Hamas.
To view full article
EGYPT:Islamic Terrorist Group Muslim Brotherhood Increases it's Seats in Parliament Five Fold
Egypt is supposed to be our "ally", who we actually give $3 billion a year to.
By MICHAEL SLACKMAN
Published: November 27, 2005
CAIRO, Nov. 27 - The Muslim Brotherhood may be banned, but it has demonstrated in the latest parliamentary elections that it is by far the strongest Egyptian opposition group, trouncing the secular political opposition and weakening the governing party's power monopoly.
Results made public today by the government showed the Brotherhood winning 29 more seats in Saturday's runoff in the second round of parliamentary voting. The group won 47 seats in the first round this month, meaning that with just one more round of elections to go, the Brotherhood already has 76 seats - more than five times its total in the departing Parliament. Because of the group's outlaw status, its candidates run as independents.
To view full article
Lebanon: Islamic Terrorist Group Hezbollah Gains Seats in Lebanese Government
After the 2005 elections, Hezbollah won fourteen seats in the 128-member Lebanese Parliament. In addition, Hezbollah has two ministers in the government, and a third is endorsed by the group.
Hezbollah did not disarm when it entered Lebanese politics, and experts say the group's new political involvement is not an indication that the group is becoming more moderate.
To view full article
The facts show us that we are talking about millions of Muslims
who support Islamic terrorists and are voting them into their governments. Not just a handful or a few as Islamic apologists try to portray. Let's
not kid ourselves, the Islamic world is getting stricter and stricter and they are not our allies. Feel free to use this article in your debates. (Please include my link).
Islamic apologists and excuse makers: Do you care to explain? I will be waiting....
Friday, May 9, 2008
Mo, who Were you? A Terrorist That's who.
Many people just do not know the ugly truth about Islam or its prophet Mohammad. Either they do not take the time to do the research or they rely on the word of Muslims. Well, since Islam encourages lying, I would not recommend asking a Muslim. It is called al-Taqiyya. If you want to learn the truth about the religion, either do your own leg work or ask an ex Muslim.
From this excerpt from the Hadiths we can see how Mohammad would wage holy war on non Muslims if they did not accept Islam, or at least remain a non Muslim but live as a dhimmi under Islamic rule.
Book 019, Number 4294:
It has been reported from Sulaiman b. Buraid through his father that when the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) appointed anyone as leader of an army or detachment he would especially exhort him to fear Allah and to be good to the Muslims who were with him. He would say: Fight in the name of Allah and in the way of Allah. Fight against those who disbelieve in Allah. Make a holy war, do not embezzle the spoils; do not break your pledge; and do not mutilate (the dead) bodies; do not kill the children. When you meet your enemies who are polytheists, invite them to three courses of action. If they respond to any one of these, you also accept it and withhold yourself from doing them any harm. Invite them to (accept) Islam; if they respond to you, accept it from them and desist from fighting against them. Then invite them to migrate from their lands to the land of Muhairs and inform them that, if they do so, they shall have all the privileges and obligations of the Muhajirs. If they refuse to migrate, tell them that they will have the status of Bedouin Muilims and will be subjected to the Commands of Allah like other Muslims, but they will not get any share from the spoils of war or Fai' except when they actually fight with the Muslims (against the disbelievers). If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the jizya. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah's help and fight them. When you lay siege to a fort and the besieged appeal to you for protection in the name of Allah and His Prophet, do not accord to them the guarantee of Allah and His Prophet, but accord to them your own guarantee and the guarantee of your companions for it is a lesser sin that the security given by you or your companions be disregarded than that the security granted in the name of Allah and His Prophet be violated When you besiege a fort and the besieged want you to let them out in accordance with Allah's Command, do not let them come out in accordance with His Command, but do so at your (own) command, for you do not know whether or not you will be able to carry out Allah's behest with regard to them.
Click here
Here it is shown that while Mohammad did not care for the deliberate killings of women and children. He had no concern for them during night raids and Mo was big on night raids.
Book 019, Number 4321:
It is reported on the authority of Sa'b b. Jaththama that the Prophet of Allah (may peace be upon him), when asked about the women and children of the polytheists being killed during the night raid, said: They are from them.
Click here
Finally we have Mohammad admitting he is a terrorist. Thanks Mo, we were not quite sure.....
Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:
Narrated Abu Huraira:
Allah's Apostle said, "I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand." Abu Huraira added: Allah's Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).
Click here
When most people think of religion they think of peace and happiness. That is not the case in regards to Islam.
From this excerpt from the Hadiths we can see how Mohammad would wage holy war on non Muslims if they did not accept Islam, or at least remain a non Muslim but live as a dhimmi under Islamic rule.
Book 019, Number 4294:
It has been reported from Sulaiman b. Buraid through his father that when the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) appointed anyone as leader of an army or detachment he would especially exhort him to fear Allah and to be good to the Muslims who were with him. He would say: Fight in the name of Allah and in the way of Allah. Fight against those who disbelieve in Allah. Make a holy war, do not embezzle the spoils; do not break your pledge; and do not mutilate (the dead) bodies; do not kill the children. When you meet your enemies who are polytheists, invite them to three courses of action. If they respond to any one of these, you also accept it and withhold yourself from doing them any harm. Invite them to (accept) Islam; if they respond to you, accept it from them and desist from fighting against them. Then invite them to migrate from their lands to the land of Muhairs and inform them that, if they do so, they shall have all the privileges and obligations of the Muhajirs. If they refuse to migrate, tell them that they will have the status of Bedouin Muilims and will be subjected to the Commands of Allah like other Muslims, but they will not get any share from the spoils of war or Fai' except when they actually fight with the Muslims (against the disbelievers). If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the jizya. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah's help and fight them. When you lay siege to a fort and the besieged appeal to you for protection in the name of Allah and His Prophet, do not accord to them the guarantee of Allah and His Prophet, but accord to them your own guarantee and the guarantee of your companions for it is a lesser sin that the security given by you or your companions be disregarded than that the security granted in the name of Allah and His Prophet be violated When you besiege a fort and the besieged want you to let them out in accordance with Allah's Command, do not let them come out in accordance with His Command, but do so at your (own) command, for you do not know whether or not you will be able to carry out Allah's behest with regard to them.
Click here
Here it is shown that while Mohammad did not care for the deliberate killings of women and children. He had no concern for them during night raids and Mo was big on night raids.
Book 019, Number 4321:
It is reported on the authority of Sa'b b. Jaththama that the Prophet of Allah (may peace be upon him), when asked about the women and children of the polytheists being killed during the night raid, said: They are from them.
Click here
Finally we have Mohammad admitting he is a terrorist. Thanks Mo, we were not quite sure.....
Volume 4, Book 52, Number 220:
Narrated Abu Huraira:
Allah's Apostle said, "I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand." Abu Huraira added: Allah's Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).
Click here
When most people think of religion they think of peace and happiness. That is not the case in regards to Islam.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
