Friday, April 17, 2009

Coming Soon:Fitna Part II

Tireless Dutch politician Geert Wilders who is by far the bravest politician in Europe is getting ready for his "next phase" in his war on Islam. He has announced that he will start working on Fitna Part II, which will focus on Muslim immigration in Europe and the USA. As I have stated in the past, Muslim immigration is the Trojan Horse to the West and it must be ended.

Fitna Part I can be viewed here.

Geert Wilders plans sequel to his film about 'fascist' Qur'an
Far-right Dutch MP Geert Wilders's followup to Fitna is to focus on the impact of Muslim immigration on Europe and the US
Ben Child

Geert Wilders, the far-right Dutch MP, has announced that he will make a sequel to his 17-minute anti-Qur'an film Fitna, which sparked protests from Muslims around the world last year and saw him banned from entering the UK.

"This is the next phase," the Freedom party leader told De Telegraaf yesterday, adding that his followup to the controversial short was intended to warn against the threat that Islam, in his view, posed to free speech. He said that the film would probably be finished next year.

Fitna – the title is an Arabic word that denotes a "test of faith" – criticised the Qur'an as a "fascist book" and interspersed images of the September 11 terrorist attacks with verses from the holy book. It was released on the internet in English and Dutch versions in March last year and screened to politicians and public figures around the globe as part of what Wilders labelled a "Facing Jihad world tour".

The film led to angry condemnation from groups as diverse as the Muslim Council of Britain and Al-Qaida, which issued a fatwa calling for his assassination. He was due to show it at the House of Lords in February but the Home Office refused him entry because his opinions "threaten community harmony and therefore public safety".

Wilders, whose party currently has nine out of the 150 seats in the Dutch parliament, said the new film would also examine the impact of Muslim immigration on Europe and the United States. "We should be more on the offensive instead of the defense," Wilders told Reuters, but added that the film is not meant to offend Muslims.

Link to Article


Tonto said...

Now here is a man I really admire.

Royd said...

"Fitna" and "An Inconvenient Truth" have much in common, namely repetition of rhetoric to hammer home a message, which is a tried and tested method of film-making.

It is worth noting in "Fitna," Muslims are only shown if they make radical statements, and the archive material has been edited to make Wilders' point: that the Koran calls for violence and Muslims are receptive to that call.

Films like this fail to deliver, because they get carried away with the rhetoric, and as such loose wider appeal for not being factually balanced.

Christopher Logan said...

Royd, the film clearly states that not all Muslims call for violence. How much more balance do you want? When there is a problem that what should be focused on. The fact is most of the world does not have the guts to face the issue. Wilder's must be doing something right, because his party was in front in the last poll that I saw and he has appeared before US Senate members. He has also given many other speeches here.

Royd said...

The problems we face are not exclusively Muslim, and it would be idle to suggest they as that would ignore the wider issue, and that is ill conceived post World War 2 immigration polices that allowed the mass migration of people who had no intention of integrating into the countries they moved to. A result of these polices was the creation of enclaves where newcomers had no reason or compulsion to integrate, the authorities compounded these problems by attempting to accommodate them and further entrench the segregation. Add to this, the poor policies of making questionable friends with certain dictatorial regimes, it is hardly surprising to find ourselves in this present situation. The problem we now face is reversing 60 years of bad policy.

Don’t get me wrong, I am not calling for an end of all immigration, just certain kinds of it, our nations became great because we were able to adapt and adopt what came here, and we need to return to those principles.

If people wish to come here, then they must make every effort to prove their worth to the nation, if it is to stay as they are, and make no effort to contribute, then they best stay where they are.

The Munz said...

I think that there is a lot to what Royd is saying.
If people want to Immigrate here then they need to do things our way.
I am a second generation American of Italian descent.
My grandparents learned how to speak and read English and learned the customs and accepted them as their own. They raised my mother and father as Americans not Italians.

Certainly we being roman catholic still hold traditional days sacred because of our faith and still observe holy days and customs of that faith.
But the point I am trying to make here is our family adapted to the culture here, it was not expected that everyone should bend to Italian ways. I never called any government office and heard Press one for English 2 for Italian.

If they come then they musty integrate to our society and by allowing them to dictate to us what they expect then they are not at all and we are enabling them to make demands.
If a woman refuses to take off her head scarf to have her photo taken for a drivers license, the answer seems pretty simple to me, she doesn't get one.

Anonymous said...

To all moderate muslims...see this series from A-C and get a grip about Islam...are you a muslim or not??
Syrian =nationality, arabic =ethnicity??
Muslim = religious under Islam.

See the series - are you muslim or not?`Moderate muslims doesnt exist.